Wednesday, February 20, 2008

San Jose Mercury - Broken Families, Broken Courts

Last week the San Jose Mercury News highlighted how the court system is failing the parents and children who fall into the system. If you've been reading this blog for any length of time, you'll know that it was not new news to me. It is getting to a point that I am starting to get jealous of myself.

That series was then followed by a story of the legal dependency service run by Gary Proctor resigning, deciding to not apply to renew his contract with the county. Per the SJ Merc, he had established an operating policy to basically 'cooperate' with Social Services and the District Attorney Office (who represent the children) instead of zealously defending the rights of parents. This resulted in numerous injustices over the years - children being wrongfully taken from parents and destroying families instead of doing everything possible to keep them together.

I remember a meeting I went to that included all the court partners in a, "what the heck are you doing?" meeting. Everyone there was cooperative and sincerely wanted to fix the problems but the person representing the legal dependency service was the only one who felt insulted that I would be so presumptuous as to tell them how to do their job. Of course, I was equally insulted that I felt I needed to tell them how to do their job that he/they were being so handsomely recompensed for. He, to his credit, and with a lump in his throat, admitted that there have been grave injustices.

As mentioned a few weeks ago right here in Adventures in Human Rights, in a conversation I had with someone from Social Services, I was told that the contract with Proctor is being reviewed and HOW representation of the parents is being done was also being reviewed, so the problem was known about and something was being done about it, even if it was just thinking about it.

While the investigative story by the San Jose Mercury News was excellent, it really just covered the surface manifestations of the problem. The old, 'follow the money' adage was not completely tracked down, and until that is done, the real solutions will not be allowed to be implemented. How's that for a teaser?!

Preview: My next posting will cover how in Santa Cruz, a 25-year veteran Psychologist with a wall full of Degrees was stripped of all civil rights in defending her husband due to false reports by a Psychiatrist, and its' devastating results. She reports to me, "Psychiatry has sold its soul to the Big Pharma."

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

Two points:

1) "starting to get jealous of yourself"? You are preaching to the choir on a lot of the stuff you post. In other words, you are not the only one concerned about these issues, nor are you prophetic in bringing them up. Not to mention that kissing your own arse in your blog is very off-putting.

2) I would love to hear exactly how the conversation went between you and Mr. Proctor. Specifically, I would like to know how a man who has been elected to office, has been a financially successful lawyer for many years, and has held a contract with this county and this court for over 11 years, would go from being "insulted" to admitting to "grave injustices" within the span of one meeting.

I don't mean to put you on the defensive, but you leave out sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much information that you claim to have. Yes, I have read your claim that you are limited in the amount of information you can provide here. But I believe that argument does not hold water in the issue above and many others--I think you will neither be breaking any laws nor violating any professional ethics by elaborating more on some of the issues with which you seem to be intimately familiar. You have stated "A purpose of this blog is let people become aware that injustices and abuses are occurring, to hopefully prevent further wrongs, and gain support in helping resolve them. What is not covered in this blog are the actions I take to contribute to solving the problems." I believe the best way to prevent further wrongs is disseminate as much accurate information as possible, so as not to render people's prevention efforts fruitless because they were misinformed or had a lack of information. I don't think you have to risk talking about "actions you take" in your own job/life in order for you to provide more information.

Thanks for reading.